Then you practice these rules without allowing space for good judgement.
Finally you even censor criticism against and a discussion about the decision – and you punish the person who dares to voice criticism.
I am writing this letter to inform you that I shall not comply with your requirement to remove a documentary photography from the Vietnam war made by Nick Ut. The demand that we remove the picture came in an e-mail from Facebook’s office in Hamburg this Wednesday morning.
I am editor-in-chief of the Norwegian daily newspaper Aftenposten.
The controversy over the Mohammad-caricatures, which flared in late 2005 and still remains a heated debate, had unknown consequences simply because the context and the original justification for publication were ignored.
You depend on Slate for sharp, distinctive coverage of the latest developments in politics and culture. Our work is more urgent than ever and is reaching more readers—but online advertising revenues don’t fully cover our costs, and we don’t have print subscribers to help keep us afloat. If you think Slate’s work matters, become a Slate Plus member.
You’ll get exclusive members-only content and a suite of great benefits—and you’ll help secure Slate’s future.
Tom then rendered Kim Phuc’s criticism against Facebook for banning her picture.
Facebook reacted by excluding Tom and prevented him from posting a new entry. First you create rules that don’t distinguish between child pornography and famous war photographs.