so if you have sex with the teenage girl you are babysitting, then it's a crime... Led I met a girl, she was asking me for a spare smoke, and her b/f came over -- she was like 14, and he was 45-50 I was so sick by it -- The guy probably has money or something which is keeping her happy, but what I don't get is how is it the guy didn't think anything was wrong with it Then we have British Columbia where in the West Kootenay (Creston) an LDS sect has a community called "Bountiful". underage is unlawful, forced coersion and forced cohabitation is unlawful, intermarriage is unlawful and the British Columbia/Canadian government puts up with it....grrrr my rantthis ones for guys and gals. Ive been out of the loop as I was married for many years. I had no idea this younger guy older woman thing was happening.
but if you have (consentual both times) sex with the teenage girl down the block that you don't really know... Why can't they just say, if you are 16 and over, if you are 18 and over... I guess I can understand it's a way to protect the very thing I mentioned above, the babysitter, the teacher, the whatever taking advantage of someone that has a feeling of trust or dependency on them- perhaps so much then that they would feel obligated to make them feel good (have sex with them) in return? Well it's bountiful allright for the half dozen or so old letches who have multiple wives and marry off their underage daughters to each other's cousins and "brothers" all in the name of religion. Im finding Im getting alot of hits on my profile by really young guys. I love to hear from other women on the board and your experience with this.
Remember that we are the largest free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
I was just wondering because I met a guy today who is dating a 15 year old. ****in' government and judicial system should give it's collective head a shake.
A person who is caring for you or supervising you, like a teacher, youth worker or foster carer, can't have sex with you or sexually touch you or perform a sexual act in front of you, even if you agree, unless they are married to you.
Likewise, under a "close-in-age" provision, if a person under 16 (and 12 or older) has sex with someone less than five years older, they can be considered to have consented unless the older person is in a position of authority.So it's never alright to go off and date one..if you are..you're pretty desperate if you can't find a person within the limits of your own age. but My nephew is marrying a woman 20 years older than himself... The whole "trust and dependency" part is the twisted thing... I remember the laws in Ohio were even more screwed up (I know because I had a teenage step-daughter at the time). he is 25 she is 45 and has a son exactly the same age as my newphew. him a masters degree in Japanese/language/literature works for a law firm... If you are under 12, a person can't have sex with you or touch you sexually or perform a sexual act in front of you, even if you agree.If you are 12 to 15, a person can’t have sex with you, touch you sexually or perform a sexual act in front of you if they are more than two years older than you, even if you agree.The exception, of course, is anal intercourse, to which unmarried persons under 18 cannot legally consent, although both the Ontario Court of Appeal(3) and the Quebec Court of Appeal(4) have struck down the relevant section of the Criminal Code. Fuckin' government and judicial system should give it's collective head a shake. Luring a child 172.1 (1) Every person commits an offence who, by means of a computer system within the meaning of subsection 342.1(2), communicates with(a) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of eighteen years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under subsection 153(1), section 155 or 163.1, subsection 212(1) or (4) or section 271, 272 or 273 with respect to that person;(b) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of sixteen years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under section 280 with respect to that person; or(c) a person who is, or who the accused believes is, under the age of fourteen years, for the purpose of facilitating the commission of an offence under section 151 or 152, subsection 160(3) or 173(2) or section 281 with respect to that person.I live in Ontario, and I believe this is one truly ****ed up disgusting law. Punishment (2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) is guilty of(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. (1) Every one who, without lawful authority, takes or causes to be taken an unmarried person under the age of sixteen years out of the possession of and against the will of the parent or guardian of that person or of any other person who has the lawful care or charge of that person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.However, it is not an offence if the person honestly believed that you were 16 or if there was less than a two-year age difference between you. For example, if a person is 17 and has sex with someone who is 15, it is not a crime.But if the person was 18, it is a crime unless the person believed the person was 16.Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc.Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing...